Difference between revisions of "Internal:Election policy amendment 2020"

From Wikimedia District of Columbia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Notes: copyedit to notes)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{header title|title=Election policy amendment 2020|status=review}}
{{header title|title=Election policy amendment 2020|status=historical}}
== Resolution #1 ==
== Resolution #1 ==
<div class="plainlinks" style="padding:1em; border: 3px #4f79a2 solid; background: #DEE7ED;">
<div class="plainlinks" style="padding:1em; border: 3px #4f79a2 solid; background: #DEE7ED;">

Latest revision as of 17:30, 23 May 2020

Status: Historical

Resolution #1


The following text is not part of the proposed resolution:

  • In III.3, make explicit that there is an expectation that the election committee produces a certain kind of report after an election: the Ballot, Exhibits, and Results as shown on Meetings_(2019–2020)
  • article VII -- in VII.1, VII.2 and VII.5, give committee a bit more time just to be realistic -- I suggest 48 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours
  • Point to where the quorum is specified, for speedy clarity. It is in the bylaws, article V section 5. A reasonable practice after an election whose results do not meet the quorum is to recruit new members and quickly run a new election.
  • ARTICLE IV - ELIGIBILITY - change to CANDIDATE ELIGIBILITY. The eligibility for the Election Committee is discussed in an earlier section.