Difference between revisions of "Internal:Public Policy/Wikimedia DC Statement supporting the Enough Act"
(draft annnouncement) |
(rephrase) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
We recognize some tradeoffs in creating the new law. For one, it creates a constraint on free expression. We are confident that the behavior outlawed here is rare, carefully and narrowly defined in the Act, and will be sensibly interpreted by law enforcers and prosecutors. The behavior is highly toxic so it is worth some cost and constraint to reduce it. |
We recognize some tradeoffs in creating the new law. For one, it creates a constraint on free expression. We are confident that the behavior outlawed here is rare, carefully and narrowly defined in the Act, and will be sensibly interpreted by law enforcers and prosecutors. The behavior is highly toxic so it is worth some cost and constraint to reduce it. |
||
| − | Another tradeoff is that it creates some risk for nonprofit knowledge programs such as Wikimedia sites. The relevant legal protections for platforms comes from the "safe harbor provision," section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. We think the protection is sufficient. |
+ | Another tradeoff is that it creates some risk for nonprofit knowledge programs such as Wikimedia sites. The relevant legal protections for platforms comes from the "safe harbor provision," section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. We think the protection is sufficient. Site administrators can eliminate the offending content, fight the action in court. |
Law enforcers and prosecutors will need to show reasonable judgment, which we expect, and if we don't see that we'll support changes. A greater danger is that too few cases will be identified. We will support further changes in law if we think the balance is not coming out right. |
Law enforcers and prosecutors will need to show reasonable judgment, which we expect, and if we don't see that we'll support changes. A greater danger is that too few cases will be identified. We will support further changes in law if we think the balance is not coming out right. |
||
Revision as of 20:41, 11 March 2018
Wikimedia DC supports the Enough Act and hopes it will pass both Houses of Congress.
We support the creation of the new, narrowly defined crime. The behavior to be outlawed -- posting of intimate images with reckless disregard for the interests of the person depicted -- has a toxic effect on online participation. It can intimidate, silence, and harass users of online platforms such as Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia sites. This behavior can drive away participants, especially women, from Wikimedia. This is not only unfair to them but it delays and adds difficulty to our offering their knowledge in our service to the public. It is therefore relevant to Wikimedia. The offense is also rare but so highly toxic that it frightens people who are not themselves attacked.
We recognize some tradeoffs in creating the new law. For one, it creates a constraint on free expression. We are confident that the behavior outlawed here is rare, carefully and narrowly defined in the Act, and will be sensibly interpreted by law enforcers and prosecutors. The behavior is highly toxic so it is worth some cost and constraint to reduce it.
Another tradeoff is that it creates some risk for nonprofit knowledge programs such as Wikimedia sites. The relevant legal protections for platforms comes from the "safe harbor provision," section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. We think the protection is sufficient. Site administrators can eliminate the offending content, fight the action in court.
Law enforcers and prosecutors will need to show reasonable judgment, which we expect, and if we don't see that we'll support changes. A greater danger is that too few cases will be identified. We will support further changes in law if we think the balance is not coming out right.
Our chapter has not previously advocated changes in law but we think this is a good and important proposal.
Signed -- Wikimedia DC public policy committee (?) (with name of the chair?)
The text of the Enough Act: https://www.harris.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/The%20ENOUGH%20Act.pdf