View source for Internal:Public Policy/Prep for Oct 8 2016 presentation at Wikimania


; Imagined slides, in rough order for [https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions:2016/Public_Policy_Advocacy_Across_Both_Coasts this presentation].

* "We", below, means WMF and WMDC officially
* what we generally favor:
:* copyright reductions, open source, patent reductions, all around the world, meaning treaties can be relevant 
:* often in line with EFF, Sunlight Foundation, . . . .
:* we think before we opine; need to stay in-bounds with our community consensus
* what we are allowed to do by tax laws for 501c3s and by our own principles -- minimal expenditures ; not wandering far off the topics above
* copyright comments -- [[/Copyright policy issues]] -- {{aye}} we made formal comments to Copyright Office about orphan works
* Briefings with congressional staff:  [[/Congressional briefings]] -- 
* editathons
* court cases, Alice case, software patents
:* Background / prep:  [http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/01/14/wikipedia-at-15/], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4695376.stm]
* [[/Patents on software and related]]  --  note Alice vs CLS Bank case to be heard at Supreme Court on March 31
* [[/Net neutrality]]
** [http://www.fcc.gov/openinternet Call for comments on the FCC's Open Internet Order]
* [[/Reform of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act]] (e.g. Aaron's law) -- we don't think hosts should be held responsible for content more than necessary
* we favor use of Wikimedia software in government, as we favor it anywhere ; there are specific actions we take along that line
* [[/Reducing online harassment]] -- note Kathleen Clark's
* [[/Practices and rules for federal government staff who edit on work time]] -- [[/Draft blog post on federal and congressional editing]]
* The [http://policy.wikimedia.org WMF Policy office] lists these five as its policy advocacy topics: Access (to the net); Copyright; Censorship; Intermediary Liability; and Privacy.  (Harassment is not on the list, but is an area where changes in law are under discussion.)
*federal open source code stuff: [[Internal:Public Policy/Federal government Open Source Policy]] -- OMB has a new policy as of early August 2016.  Peter commented, not specifically representing the chapter, in the drafts offered in March and April 2016.  Peter to send a summary to WMF public policy list.
*Peter to research:  anything in cyberscoop and fedscoop and govloop etc
*meeting with Julia Reda
*WMDC was invited to present to communications staffers on the Hill in May 2016. This window fell through.  Peter hopes to present in the period after the election.  Plans to present to senate staff -- Ask the attendees about it!  (1) no idea or no coment (2) recommend yes (3) recommend no
*plans to host a forum

; Abstract shown on [https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions:2016/Public_Policy_Advocacy_Across_Both_Coasts wikiconference site]
This will be a joint panel discussion containing members of both the Wikimedia Foundation's legal team and Wikimedia District of Columbia's Public Policy Committee.
We will discuss how each organization approaches public policy, and how we participate in policy conversations. We will discuss the limits on lobbying that we face as nonprofits, the meetings and discussions we have had with government officials (including congressional staff and a member of the European parliament), and the process of submitting written statements to government bodies.
We will recount our recent and ongoing advocacy efforts, on topics such as:
Orphan works reform. Orphan works are works whose authors are unknown or uncontactable, and thus cannot be reused while they are under copyright. Many countries have provisions allowing the reuse of orphan works under certain circumstances, but the United States as of yet does not. The Copyright Office has been undertaking a study to develop recommendations to Congress on allowing the reuse of orphan works, to which WMF and WMDC have submitted written statements (WMDC, WMF).
Public domain status of California state government works. California is one of the few U.S. states whose works are considered to be in the public domain. Earlier this year, the California Legislature considered a bill which would have placed some or all of its state works under copyright. Both WMF and WMDC submitted letters to the California Senate Judiciary Committee (WMF, WMDC) opposing this change, as Wikimedia projects currently host over 1100 public domain images from the California government.
Copyright notice-and-takedown system. In preparation for making copyright reform recommendations to Congress, the US Copyright Office has been soliciting feedback on a number of provisions of copyright law. WMF has been actively participating in their study of DMCA section 512. That section of the law protects platforms like Wikimedia from liability for copyright infringement by user-uploaded content. It also creates the notice-and-takedown process for rightsholders to request content be removed from platforms. WMF has submitted written comments to the Copyright Office on the issue, as well as participated in roundtable discussions.
Content removal litigation. A case coming before the Canadian Supreme Court, Google was ordered to globally remove search results as part of the judgement of a case that Google wasn't a party to. Out of concerns of the potential effect such court orders could have on free expression, and on Wikipedia in particular, WMF has moved to intervene.
We will also describe some recent court decisions, as well as the U.S. federal government efforts toward open data and open source policy, which are likely to make it easier for government staff to work cooperatively on Wikimedia software and data, and for Wikimedians to make use of what the government can offer.

[[Category: Public policy workspace]]