Difference between revisions of "Internal:Activities of the chapter"

From Wikimedia District of Columbia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(text copied from various places)
(percentages)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* f. How does the activity further your exempt purposes?
 
* f. How does the activity further your exempt purposes?
   
  +
----
1. Institutional partnerships (edit-a-thons)
 
  +
 
;1. Institutional partnerships (edit-a-thons)
   
 
Our main effort is our institutional partnerships program, by which we hold collaborative editing events to improve online Wikimedia content in partnerships with institutions that had collections, interest, or knowledge in particular areas. Many were oriented to expanding participation or coverage of historically under-represented groups. Our institutional partners included cultural, academic, and government institutions, professional associations, and non-governmental organizations. The partners are listed on our public web site: https://wikimediadc.org/wiki/Plans_and_reports
 
Our main effort is our institutional partnerships program, by which we hold collaborative editing events to improve online Wikimedia content in partnerships with institutions that had collections, interest, or knowledge in particular areas. Many were oriented to expanding participation or coverage of historically under-represented groups. Our institutional partners included cultural, academic, and government institutions, professional associations, and non-governmental organizations. The partners are listed on our public web site: https://wikimediadc.org/wiki/Plans_and_reports
Line 17: Line 19:
 
Collaborative events editing the Wikimedia sites are the most common activities. We run 25-30 of these each year. They usually include a training hour, followed by a time For most of our history, these events were usually in person and occasionally online. Since covid, they are usually online using zoom. Most of these 30 events are designed to increased Wikimedia coverage of underrepresented groups and topics, and diversity of participation. Our institutional partners included a broad spectrum of cultural, academic, and government institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and other groups.
 
Collaborative events editing the Wikimedia sites are the most common activities. We run 25-30 of these each year. They usually include a training hour, followed by a time For most of our history, these events were usually in person and occasionally online. Since covid, they are usually online using zoom. Most of these 30 events are designed to increased Wikimedia coverage of underrepresented groups and topics, and diversity of participation. Our institutional partners included a broad spectrum of cultural, academic, and government institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and other groups.
   
  +
Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 80% of our total time and 25% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and donations from individuals.
2. Photography competitions
 
  +
 
;2. Photography competitions
   
 
Wikimedia DC has organized the U.S. branch of the biennial Wiki Science Competition since 2017. This is an international science photography competition. The U.S. competition received ? contributions in five categories, including ? general images, ? images of wildlife, ? images of people in science, ? microscopy images, ? non-photographic submissions, and ? images as
 
Wikimedia DC has organized the U.S. branch of the biennial Wiki Science Competition since 2017. This is an international science photography competition. The U.S. competition received ? contributions in five categories, including ? general images, ? images of wildlife, ? images of people in science, ? microscopy images, ? non-photographic submissions, and ? images as
Line 27: Line 31:
 
ers
 
ers
   
  +
Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time and 2% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and donations from individuals.
3. Fiscal sponsorships
 
  +
 
;3. Fiscal sponsorships
   
 
We have acted as fiscal sponsor for many large efforts by others in the Wikimedia community. In this capacity, we hold and disburse funds for the grantees, but do not actively direct their activities. Our largest fiscal sponsorships were WikiConference North America in 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2021; Art+Feminism in 2015, 2016, and 2017
 
We have acted as fiscal sponsor for many large efforts by others in the Wikimedia community. In this capacity, we hold and disburse funds for the grantees, but do not actively direct their activities. Our largest fiscal sponsorships were WikiConference North America in 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2021; Art+Feminism in 2015, 2016, and 2017
   
  +
Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time and 20% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation.
4. Research contracts
 
  +
 
;4. Research contracts
  +
  +
Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent ?% of our total time and ?% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through contracts from ?.
  +
 
;5. Training and support
   
5. Training and support
 
 
2018 Wikimedia Leadership Boot Camp. Organized in collaboration with the National Archives and Records Administration, the three-day event included sessions across a spectrum of topics, including train-the-trainer, community leadership, event organizing and planning, institutional outreach, grants, online tools, risk management, and safe space policies. Attendees included invited 12 trainee participants and 16 presenters, including chapter leadership, Wikimedia Foundation staff, and community program organizers.
 
2018 Wikimedia Leadership Boot Camp. Organized in collaboration with the National Archives and Records Administration, the three-day event included sessions across a spectrum of topics, including train-the-trainer, community leadership, event organizing and planning, institutional outreach, grants, online tools, risk management, and safe space policies. Attendees included invited 12 trainee participants and 16 presenters, including chapter leadership, Wikimedia Foundation staff, and community program organizers.
   
Line 41: Line 52:
   
 
Wikimania 2012
 
Wikimania 2012
  +
  +
Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 15% of our total time and 45% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and a contract from the National Archives Trust Fund Board.
   
 
6. Grantmaking
 
6. Grantmaking
   
 
Book grants and small grants up to 2016
 
Book grants and small grants up to 2016
  +
  +
Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time and 0.5% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and donations from individuals.
   
 
7. Public policy
 
7. Public policy
Line 53: Line 68:
   
 
Committee members attended a Supreme Court case on software patents, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, and wrote most of the English Wikipedia article on the subject.
 
Committee members attended a Supreme Court case on software patents, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, and wrote most of the English Wikipedia article on the subject.
  +
  +
Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time on these activities. No expenses were incurred for these activities.

Revision as of 05:46, 11 September 2022

4 of 13 Part IV - Your Activities See instructions for more information: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1023.pdf#page=8

1. Describe completely and in detail your past, present, and planned activities. Do not refer to or repeat the purposes in your organizing document. For each past, present, or planned activity, include information that answers the following questions:

  • a. What is the activity?
  • b. Who conducts the activity?
  • c. Where is the activity conducted?
  • d. What percentage of your total time is allocated to the activity?
  • e. How is the activity funded (for example, donations, fees, etc.) and what percentage of your overall expenses is allocated to this activity?
  • f. How does the activity further your exempt purposes?

1. Institutional partnerships (edit-a-thons)

Our main effort is our institutional partnerships program, by which we hold collaborative editing events to improve online Wikimedia content in partnerships with institutions that had collections, interest, or knowledge in particular areas. Many were oriented to expanding participation or coverage of historically under-represented groups. Our institutional partners included cultural, academic, and government institutions, professional associations, and non-governmental organizations. The partners are listed on our public web site: https://wikimediadc.org/wiki/Plans_and_reports

Collaborative events editing the Wikimedia sites are the most common activities. We run 25-30 of these each year. They usually include a training hour, followed by a time For most of our history, these events were usually in person and occasionally online. Since covid, they are usually online using zoom. Most of these 30 events are designed to increased Wikimedia coverage of underrepresented groups and topics, and diversity of participation. Our institutional partners included a broad spectrum of cultural, academic, and government institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and other groups.

Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 80% of our total time and 25% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and donations from individuals.

2. Photography competitions

Wikimedia DC has organized the U.S. branch of the biennial Wiki Science Competition since 2017. This is an international science photography competition. The U.S. competition received ? contributions in five categories, including ? general images, ? images of wildlife, ? images of people in science, ? microscopy images, ? non-photographic submissions, and ? images as part of sets. The jury selected eight submissions as "Jury's Choice" awards, each of which received a $200 or $250 prize from Wikimedia DC. The jury selected six winners in each category to represent the U.S. at the international level. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Science_Competition_2019_in_the_United_States

Wikimedia DC has also provided volunteer support for Wiki Loves Monuments in the U.S. since ???, which saw over ? people contribute over ? photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. In addition to National Register of Historic Places sites, we welcomed uploads of sites designated by state- and local-level historical institutions and societies. Hundreds of these photos are being used to help illustrate pages across various Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia and Wikidata. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2019_in_the_United_States/Winn ers

Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time and 2% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and donations from individuals.

3. Fiscal sponsorships

We have acted as fiscal sponsor for many large efforts by others in the Wikimedia community. In this capacity, we hold and disburse funds for the grantees, but do not actively direct their activities. Our largest fiscal sponsorships were WikiConference North America in 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2021; Art+Feminism in 2015, 2016, and 2017

Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time and 20% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation.

4. Research contracts

Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent ?% of our total time and ?% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through contracts from ?.

5. Training and support

2018 Wikimedia Leadership Boot Camp. Organized in collaboration with the National Archives and Records Administration, the three-day event included sessions across a spectrum of topics, including train-the-trainer, community leadership, event organizing and planning, institutional outreach, grants, online tools, risk management, and safe space policies. Attendees included invited 12 trainee participants and 16 presenters, including chapter leadership, Wikimedia Foundation staff, and community program organizers.

2015–16: Wikimedia DC continued a tradition of high-impact training workshops for Wikimedia program leadership, hosting a GLAM Boot Camp in collaboration with the National Archives and the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium in June 2016. The event was attended by 18 established and emerging program leaders and subject-matter experts from across the Wikimedia community in the United States. Wikimedia DC additionally hosted several smaller training workshops, including a Wikipedia for Health and Safety Research and Data workshop, hosted in collaboration with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in December, and a Teaching with Wikipedia workshop, hosted in collaboration with Wiki Education Foundation in February. Over the course of the fiscal year, Wikimedia DC helped to plan and organize two major cross-program events: WikiConference USA 2015 in October and Wikimedia Diversity Conference 2016 in June. Both events were hosted at the National Archives in Washington DC.

In August 2014, Wikimedia DC hosted its first Workshop Facilitator Training. The event brought together 12 active Wikimedians from across the United States and taught them personalized techniques for executing projects in their existing communities. Early feedback from the attendees was overwhelmingly positive.

Wikimania 2012

Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 15% of our total time and 45% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and a contract from the National Archives Trust Fund Board.

6. Grantmaking

Book grants and small grants up to 2016

Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time and 0.5% of our overall expenses on these activities, which were funded through grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and donations from individuals.

7. Public policy

During the 2013–14 fiscal year, Wikimedia DC established a Public Policy Committee to present the unique perspectives and needs of Wikimedians to the various government agencies that make decisions on issues affecting the Wikimedia movement. The committee's first initiative was to participate in a roundtable panel on orphan works convened by the US Copyright Office. Wikimedia DC submitted official written comments on legislative proposals to handle these orphan works, marking the first time the organization has offered official advice to a government agency.

In addition, the Public Policy Committee pursued activities related to fostering good relations between the Wikimedia movement and Congress and its staff. Wikimedia DC volunteers met with House and Senate staffers on Capitol Hill for briefings on subjects of mutual interest, including copyright rules and support for making cultural content freely available online. More recently, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute hosted a panel on Wikipedia editing for Congressional staff. The event received significant press coverage in light of recent controversies surrounding Congressional editing, and Wikimedia DC later published a blog post supporting Congressional staff making edits to Wikimedia.

Committee members attended a Supreme Court case on software patents, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, and wrote most of the English Wikipedia article on the subject.

Since our inception in 2011, we estimate that we have spent 1% of our total time on these activities. No expenses were incurred for these activities.