Difference between revisions of "Internal:Public Policy/Reform of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+cat) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Justice department is "open" to reform: [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/07/the-justice-department-used-this-law-to-pursue-aaron-swartz-now-its-open-to-reforming-it/ The Justice Department used this law to pursue Aaron Swartz. Now it’s open to reforming it.], by Brian Fung, ''Washington Post'', Feb 7 2014. |
* Justice department is "open" to reform: [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/07/the-justice-department-used-this-law-to-pursue-aaron-swartz-now-its-open-to-reforming-it/ The Justice Department used this law to pursue Aaron Swartz. Now it’s open to reforming it.], by Brian Fung, ''Washington Post'', Feb 7 2014. |
||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Public policy]] |
||
Revision as of 19:48, 8 March 2014
- Research "Aaron's law" proposal (named for Aaron Swartz) from Rep. Lofgren's office: proposed revision to Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to reduce penalties and maybe more. [1]. A contact person at Lofgren's office is senior legislative counsel: harley.geiger at mail.house.gov ; 225-3072.
- Justice department is "open" to reform: The Justice Department used this law to pursue Aaron Swartz. Now it’s open to reforming it., by Brian Fung, Washington Post, Feb 7 2014.