Difference between revisions of "User:Econterms/WMDC meeting procedure"
(Created page with " The chapter's bylaws state in Bylaws#ARTICLE_XII_-_PARLIAMENTARY_AUTHORITY Article 12 that ''Robert's Rules of Order'' govern our meeting procedure except when inconsiste...") |
(more from Robert's, with hyperlinks) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | (1) If the chairperson ("chair") anticipates that there will be unanimous consent to a motion, the chair may avoid the delay of taking a vote by saying: "If there is no objection, the motion will be adopted. [pause] Since there is no objection, the motion is adopted."<ref name=R58>"Never wait for mere routine motions to be seconded, when you know no one objects to them." If the chair is asked to handle it differently, do so immediately. [http://www.bartleby.com/176/58.html Robert's Rules, 1915, Article X, section 58]</ref> In that context: |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
:If no member objects, the motion is adopted. But if any member objects, the motion is not adopted and cannot be agreed to without a formal vote. Raising an objection does not necessarily imply that the objector disagrees with the proposal itself. They may simply believe that it would be better to take a formal vote.<ref>[[w:Unanimous_consent#Procedure]]</ref> |
:If no member objects, the motion is adopted. But if any member objects, the motion is not adopted and cannot be agreed to without a formal vote. Raising an objection does not necessarily imply that the objector disagrees with the proposal itself. They may simply believe that it would be better to take a formal vote.<ref>[[w:Unanimous_consent#Procedure]]</ref> |
||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
In the US House of Representatives this phrasing is sometimes compressed to simply "Without objection, the motion is adopted" and the chair does not even really pause. Again, this is called a '''unanimous consent''' situation. |
In the US House of Representatives this phrasing is sometimes compressed to simply "Without objection, the motion is adopted" and the chair does not even really pause. Again, this is called a '''unanimous consent''' situation. |
||
| + | (2) Motions referring to the chairman should be put to vote by the VP or by the Secretary.<ref name=R58/> |
||
| + | |||
| + | (3) The '''minutes''' generally should record the name of the member who introduced a main motion, but not the seconder. And the minutes are to record what is 'done' by the assembly, and not what is said (debated) by its members. If a vote is by yeas and nays, the list of names on each side should be recorded.<ref name=R60>[http://www.bartleby.com/176/58.html Robert's Rules, 1915, Article X, section 58]</ref> |
||
| + | |||
| + | (4) Informally we have agreed not to record all guests to the Wikimedia DC board meetings, just those whose names come up in the discussion or appiontments. |
||
=== References === |
=== References === |
||
| − | < |
+ | <references/> |
Latest revision as of 21:44, 25 June 2022
The chapter's bylaws state in Article 12 that our meeting procedures will follow Robert's Rules of Order except when that would be inconsistent with other bylaws or special rules of order the board adopts.
It is unrealistic for our board members to learn and apply all those rules so let's distill a few of the de facto relevant ones here:
(1) If the chairperson ("chair") anticipates that there will be unanimous consent to a motion, the chair may avoid the delay of taking a vote by saying: "If there is no objection, the motion will be adopted. [pause] Since there is no objection, the motion is adopted."[1] In that context:
- If no member objects, the motion is adopted. But if any member objects, the motion is not adopted and cannot be agreed to without a formal vote. Raising an objection does not necessarily imply that the objector disagrees with the proposal itself. They may simply believe that it would be better to take a formal vote.[2]
In the US House of Representatives this phrasing is sometimes compressed to simply "Without objection, the motion is adopted" and the chair does not even really pause. Again, this is called a unanimous consent situation.
(2) Motions referring to the chairman should be put to vote by the VP or by the Secretary.[1]
(3) The minutes generally should record the name of the member who introduced a main motion, but not the seconder. And the minutes are to record what is 'done' by the assembly, and not what is said (debated) by its members. If a vote is by yeas and nays, the list of names on each side should be recorded.[3]
(4) Informally we have agreed not to record all guests to the Wikimedia DC board meetings, just those whose names come up in the discussion or appiontments.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 "Never wait for mere routine motions to be seconded, when you know no one objects to them." If the chair is asked to handle it differently, do so immediately. Robert's Rules, 1915, Article X, section 58
- ↑ w:Unanimous_consent#Procedure
- ↑ Robert's Rules, 1915, Article X, section 58