Difference between revisions of "Internal:Audit"

From Wikimedia District of Columbia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(updated materials)
(copies to review)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
* [[Annual_financial_report_(2011–2012) | Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2011–12]] -- note statement of audit committee that year
  +
* [[Annual_financial_report_(2014–2015) | Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2014–15]]
  +
 
=== Audit committee's charter and responsibilities ===
 
=== Audit committee's charter and responsibilities ===
 
* Wikimedia DC has a standing Audit Committee of 3 or more Directors who shall conduct an annual review of the financial records of the Corporation. (from the [[Bylaws]])
 
* Wikimedia DC has a standing Audit Committee of 3 or more Directors who shall conduct an annual review of the financial records of the Corporation. (from the [[Bylaws]])
Line 8: Line 11:
 
* Could examine whether Fiscal Controls was followed.
 
* Could examine whether Fiscal Controls was followed.
 
* more centrally, see the [[Fiscal control policy]]
 
* more centrally, see the [[Fiscal control policy]]
  +
* At a top level, the committee's main task is to look at WMDC's financial records (which includes the detailed accounting records in QuickBooks, plus the summary financial statements in our annual financial report) and verify their accuracy.
  +
  +
Given the relatively small number of transactions last year, it's not particularly infeasible to do an exhaustive comparison of the underlying bank/debit/PayPal/etc. transactions against the QuickBooks records, but you can be more selective and do spot checks or some other form of verification, as you see fit. Walter and I have gone through a high-level reconciliation (e.g. checking that the balances on our bank account statements match the amounts in QuickBooks) for last year, so I'm not anticipating that you'll run into anything particularly surprising.
  +
  +
Once you've examined the records (and, if you found anything that needs to be corrected, worked with Walter and myself to make the necessary updates), the committee should produce some sort of statement to the effect of "we looked at the records and think that they're accurate". The statement can be something substantive and detailed (like the one written by Mat Bisanz) or something shorter and more high-level; that's basically up to you.
   
 
* [[Annual_financial_report_(2010–2011) | Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2010–11]]
 
* [[Annual_financial_report_(2010–2011) | Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2010–11]]

Revision as of 21:50, 7 May 2016

Audit committee's charter and responsibilities

  • Wikimedia DC has a standing Audit Committee of 3 or more Directors who shall conduct an annual review of the financial records of the Corporation. (from the Bylaws)
  • Also from Bylaws, ARTICLE X - FISCAL CONTROLS (edited to focus on audit issues):
  • Disbursements over $25 shall be made only by check drawn on the Corporation's bank account or by electronic means, except where a resolution of the Board allows for cash disbursements in excess of $25 for specific purposes. Any disbursement over $5 shall be supported by voucher or receipt. All checks, drafts, notes and evidence of indebtedness of the Corporation shall be signed by either the Treasurer or the President. Disbursements in excess of $2,500 shall require the signature or written approval of both the President and the Treasurer.
  • 2. Annual Budget. Prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, the Board shall prepare an estimated budget for the following fiscal year for the approval of a majority of those present and voting at a membership meeting.
  • 4. Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures in excess of $1,000 must be approved by a majority of those present and voting at a membership meeting. Approval of a line item in the annual budget shall constitute membership approval of a capital expenditure.
  • Need to audit chapter's finances from 2014-2015.
  • Could examine whether Fiscal Controls was followed.
  • more centrally, see the Fiscal control policy
  • At a top level, the committee's main task is to look at WMDC's financial records (which includes the detailed accounting records in QuickBooks, plus the summary financial statements in our annual financial report) and verify their accuracy.

Given the relatively small number of transactions last year, it's not particularly infeasible to do an exhaustive comparison of the underlying bank/debit/PayPal/etc. transactions against the QuickBooks records, but you can be more selective and do spot checks or some other form of verification, as you see fit. Walter and I have gone through a high-level reconciliation (e.g. checking that the balances on our bank account statements match the amounts in QuickBooks) for last year, so I'm not anticipating that you'll run into anything particularly surprising.

Once you've examined the records (and, if you found anything that needs to be corrected, worked with Walter and myself to make the necessary updates), the committee should produce some sort of statement to the effect of "we looked at the records and think that they're accurate". The statement can be something substantive and detailed (like the one written by Mat Bisanz) or something shorter and more high-level; that's basically up to you.

  • Whistleblower policy - . . . the report shall be submitted to the Chair of the Audit Committee. . . for review of Wikimedia District of Columbia operations by the Audit Committee.


References