Difference between revisions of "Internal:Public Policy/Copyright policy issues"

From Wikimedia District of Columbia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(move index orphan works, mass digitization, SOPA/PIPA, and other copyright issues here)
(→‎Orphan works: cleanup)
Line 7: Line 7:
   
 
=== Orphan works ===
 
=== Orphan works ===
* '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_works Orphan works]''': The public policy committee has been asked to formulate the chapter's stand on copyright issues for "orphan works" for an [http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/ upcoming workshop]. Document due March 8, 2014. Gerald wrote to the WMF general counsel's office.
+
* The public policy committee formulated the chapter's stand on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_works Orphan works]--works for which no copyright holder who might give permission can be located-- for an [http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/ upcoming workshop].
 
:From the Copyright Office description of the workshop agenda:
 
:From the Copyright Office description of the workshop agenda:
 
::''The Copyright Office is reviewing the problem of orphan works under U.S. copyright law in continuation of its previous work on the subject and to advise Congress on possible next steps for the United States. The Office has long shared the concern with many in the copyright community that the uncertainty surrounding the ownership status of orphan works does not serve the objectives of the copyright system. For good faith users, orphan works are a frustration, a liability risk, and a major cause of gridlock in the digital marketplace. . . . [A] number of foreign governments have recently adopted or proposed solutions.''
 
::''The Copyright Office is reviewing the problem of orphan works under U.S. copyright law in continuation of its previous work on the subject and to advise Congress on possible next steps for the United States. The Office has long shared the concern with many in the copyright community that the uncertainty surrounding the ownership status of orphan works does not serve the objectives of the copyright system. For good faith users, orphan works are a frustration, a liability risk, and a major cause of gridlock in the digital marketplace. . . . [A] number of foreign governments have recently adopted or proposed solutions.''
 
:We finished it! It's our first publication, in March 2014. The [http://wikimediadc.org/images/0/07/Comment_on_Orphan_Works_and_Mass_Digitization.pdf resulting doc] is [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Advocacy#Advocacy_discussions_and_activity listed on meta with other advocacy statements by chapters].
 
:We finished it! It's our first publication, in March 2014. The [http://wikimediadc.org/images/0/07/Comment_on_Orphan_Works_and_Mass_Digitization.pdf resulting doc] is [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Advocacy#Advocacy_discussions_and_activity listed on meta with other advocacy statements by chapters].
** [[Internal:Public_Policy/Orphan_works]] -- Wikimedia DC participated in [http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/ workshop on copyrights for orphan works on March 10-11], 2014
+
* [[Internal:Public_Policy/Orphan_works]] -- Wikimedia DC participated in [http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/ workshop on copyrights for orphan works on March 10-11], 2014
** We should watch [http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/] for future copyright inquiries we might want to respond to.
+
* We can watch [http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/] for future copyright inquiries we might want to respond to.
   
 
=== Other topics ===
 
=== Other topics ===

Revision as of 17:35, 12 October 2015

Workspace: Public policy

This is an internal working space for Wikimedia-DC members developing and understanding and possible recommendations about copyright policy.

Mass digitization issue with comments by WMF

Orphan works

  • The public policy committee formulated the chapter's stand on Orphan works--works for which no copyright holder who might give permission can be located-- for an upcoming workshop.
From the Copyright Office description of the workshop agenda:
The Copyright Office is reviewing the problem of orphan works under U.S. copyright law in continuation of its previous work on the subject and to advise Congress on possible next steps for the United States. The Office has long shared the concern with many in the copyright community that the uncertainty surrounding the ownership status of orphan works does not serve the objectives of the copyright system. For good faith users, orphan works are a frustration, a liability risk, and a major cause of gridlock in the digital marketplace. . . . [A] number of foreign governments have recently adopted or proposed solutions.
We finished it! It's our first publication, in March 2014. The resulting doc is listed on meta with other advocacy statements by chapters.

Other topics

History

  • In 2011, SOPA and PIPA were bills motivated partly by the TV, film, and TV industries to incorporate copyright protection into the infrastructure of the Internet. The Wikimedia Foundation and many allied groups stood against bills proposed in the U.S. Congress that would impose burdens on wiki sites (among others) if users created certain copyright-related content there. This chapter stood with the movement on this, supporting WMF's blackout of the Wikipedias. This was framed as advocating for Internet freedom. Here was Wiki DC's statement on SOPA and PIPA. Amazingly the effort was beaten back -- our side won.