Internal talk:Public Policy/Orphan works

From Wikimedia District of Columbia
Revision as of 15:40, 9 March 2014 by Econterms (talk | contribs) (→‎Proposal from Copyright Office: notes moved under project page)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments from Slowking4

  • Slowking4 says we want a procedure that we can say we followed in the metadata of an uploaded file. We'll put it in the licensing terms e.g. on commons. It gives a "safe harbor" - a defense for the good faith. we could also have a licensing procedure going forward. they could migrate it to flicker, after it had been digitized by Wikimedians. The copyright holder would benefit from it. (just pennies normally). it cuts through the uncertainty. if we agree to the procedure we can keep these cases out of court. This way nobody needs to threaten that. We are already doing well at crediting the source of photos."
  • "We're in favor of any reform." We do not need to take a specific stance on specific legislation here. Our principles are clear and simple.
  • We can mention in our briefings in April, and suggested congressional briefings prep on April 12, and briefings themselves on April 14. Could include students.