Difference between revisions of "Internal:Public Policy"

From Wikimedia District of Columbia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(moved elements to subpages)
(reorg and clarification)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The Public Policy Committee is a [[Advisory_committee_policy#ARTICLE_IV_.E2.80.93_OTHER_COMMITTEES|chapter committee]] to develop expertise and consensus on public policy matters and advise the board. In the long run we may write white papers and recommend public policy, when these recommendations are approved by the board. Any chapter money we budget for policy positions and lobbying must be small in order to stay within the rules on nopnprofit organizations.
 
The Public Policy Committee is a [[Advisory_committee_policy#ARTICLE_IV_.E2.80.93_OTHER_COMMITTEES|chapter committee]] to develop expertise and consensus on public policy matters and advise the board. In the long run we may write white papers and recommend public policy, when these recommendations are approved by the board. Any chapter money we budget for policy positions and lobbying must be small in order to stay within the rules on nopnprofit organizations.
 
Here are constructive things we can do:
 
* edit articles on legislation and court cases (meeting usual criteria of neutral language, sourcing of statements, and working cooperatively online) -- we've done well creating the article on the upcoming case [[w:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International|Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International]]
 
* team up with Cato Institute for edit-a-thons
 
:* could organize an [[User:Econterms/Possible Government procurement edit-a-thon | edit-a-thon on government procurement topics]] ; or, again do one on legislation
 
 
* Can organize group trip to see software patents case argued at Supreme Court.
 
* Can take public positions on copyrights, patents, and free knowledge issues? Coordinated with WMF and others? Erik Moeller pointed me to a Luis Villa and Stephen P. in the WMF general counsel's office to coordinate with on software patents issue.
 
   
 
; Issue areas and activities
 
; Issue areas and activities
 
* [[/Copyright policy issues]] -- Wikimedia DC participating in workshop on copyrights for orphan works on March 10-11
 
* [[/Copyright policy issues]] -- Wikimedia DC participating in workshop on copyrights for orphan works on March 10-11
 
* [[/Patents on software and related]] -- note Alice vs CLS Bank case to be heard at Supreme Court on March 31
 
* [[/Patents on software and related]] -- note Alice vs CLS Bank case to be heard at Supreme Court on March 31
* [[/Net neutrality]]
 
 
* [[/Taking positions on public policy and nonprofit-charity status]] for Wikimedia DC
 
* [[/Taking positions on public policy and nonprofit-charity status]] for Wikimedia DC
 
* [[/Congressional briefings]]
 
* [[/Congressional briefings]]
 
* [[/Net neutrality]]
 
* The Wikimedia DC board must approve any public document from the committee representing the chapter, before release
 
 
* Work group should not claim to represent Wiki-DC without board approval of specifics
 
* Generally Wiki-DC and this group should takes stances (if any) that are in the public interest of free knowledge, not stances organized towards the narrow interest of the organization
 
* Members can self-identify as members of Wiki DC in public, without apology, but do not generally represent the organization except with board approval
 
:* Wikipedias in Native American languages
 
   
 
; Background, and other topics of interest:
 
; Background, and other topics of interest:
Line 30: Line 15:
 
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-01-08/Public_Domain_Day Public Domain Day mentioned in ''Signpost'']
 
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-01-08/Public_Domain_Day Public Domain Day mentioned in ''Signpost'']
 
* The potential right-to-repair [https://www.eff.org/event/remember-remember-5th-november-ifixit], [http://ifixit.org/right], [http://www.daily-journal.com/business/ifixit-and-the-right-to-repair/article_07143f91-5093-53bd-b805-ccf993bda787.html?mode=jqm]
 
* The potential right-to-repair [https://www.eff.org/event/remember-remember-5th-november-ifixit], [http://ifixit.org/right], [http://www.daily-journal.com/business/ifixit-and-the-right-to-repair/article_07143f91-5093-53bd-b805-ccf993bda787.html?mode=jqm]
* [http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/01/17/senators-fight-preserve-tribal-cultures-through-native-languages-153158 Native Language Immersion Student Achievement Act]
+
* Wikipedias in Native American languages ; [http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/01/17/senators-fight-preserve-tribal-cultures-through-native-languages-153158 Native Language Immersion Student Achievement Act]
 
* edit articles on legislation and court cases (meeting usual criteria of neutral language, sourcing of statements, and working cooperatively online) -- we've done well creating the article on the upcoming case [[w:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International|Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International]]
 
* could organize an [[User:Econterms/Possible Government procurement edit-a-thon | edit-a-thon on government procurement topics]] ; or, again do one on legislation -- with Cato Institute
  +
* join WikiProject Public Policy
  +
  +
; Our role and constraints
 
* The Wikimedia DC board must approve any public document from the committee representing the chapter, before release
 
* Committee members should not claim to represent Wiki DC without board approval of specifics, but can self-identify as members of Wiki DC
 
* Generally Wiki-DC and this group should take only stances that are in the public interest of free knowledge, not stances organized towards the narrow interest of the organization

Revision as of 04:04, 28 February 2014

The Public Policy Committee is a chapter committee to develop expertise and consensus on public policy matters and advise the board. In the long run we may write white papers and recommend public policy, when these recommendations are approved by the board. Any chapter money we budget for policy positions and lobbying must be small in order to stay within the rules on nopnprofit organizations.

Issue areas and activities
Background, and other topics of interest
Our role and constraints
  • The Wikimedia DC board must approve any public document from the committee representing the chapter, before release
  • Committee members should not claim to represent Wiki DC without board approval of specifics, but can self-identify as members of Wiki DC
  • Generally Wiki-DC and this group should take only stances that are in the public interest of free knowledge, not stances organized towards the narrow interest of the organization