Difference between revisions of "Talk:Election policy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(more detail) |
(→draft proposal for early 2020 update to policy: clarify quorum) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* In III.3, make explicit that there is an expectation thtat the election committee produces a certain kind of report after an election, e.g. (), |
* In III.3, make explicit that there is an expectation thtat the election committee produces a certain kind of report after an election, e.g. (), |
||
* VII.23 and VII.5 -- give committee a bit more time |
* VII.23 and VII.5 -- give committee a bit more time |
||
+ | * point to the bylaws where the quorum is specified ; it shouldn't be a mystery or require a lot of indirection or searching |
||
-- [[User:Econterms|Econterms]] ([[User talk:Econterms|talk]]) 19:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
-- [[User:Econterms|Econterms]] ([[User talk:Econterms|talk]]) 19:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:59, 7 December 2019
Some notes of clarification based on a board meeting:
- IV. 1. (f) The clean hands requirement is thought necessary because some documents the Board will have to submit to DC require the Board to state that its members do not have more than $100 in late taxes, parking fees, etc.
- V. 1.(b) Board members expect that the conflict of duty disclosure will be necessary for some federal government employees, and perhaps some people who have signed noncompete clauses.
- VII. 2. All members of Wikimedia DC can vote; there is no other criterion. -- Econterms 19:21, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
draft proposal for early 2020 update to policy
- In III.3, make explicit that there is an expectation thtat the election committee produces a certain kind of report after an election, e.g. (),
- VII.23 and VII.5 -- give committee a bit more time
- point to the bylaws where the quorum is specified ; it shouldn't be a mystery or require a lot of indirection or searching