Difference between revisions of "User:Econterms"

From Wikimedia District of Columbia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 38: Line 38:
 
== Public policy work group proposal ==
 
== Public policy work group proposal ==
 
* Work group within Wiki DC
 
* Work group within Wiki DC
  +
* Can create and improve articles on legislation and court cases (meeting usual criteria of neutral language, sourcing of statements, and working cooperatively online) -- we've done well so far, creating the article on the upcoming case [[w:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International|Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International]]
* Can improve articles on legislation and court cases
 
 
* Can team up with Cato Institute for edit-a-thons
 
* Can team up with Cato Institute for edit-a-thons
:* could organize an [[/Possible Government procurement edit-a-thon | edit-a-thon on government procurement topics]] ; or, again on legislation
+
:* could organize an [[/Possible Government procurement edit-a-thon | edit-a-thon on government procurement topics]] ; or, again do one on legislation
 
* Prepare congressional briefings in 2014 after good experiences in 2013 ([[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Slowking4/congressional_briefing_agenda|Prep materials used in 2013 round]])
* Should not represent Wiki-DC wout board approval
 
  +
* Takes stances if any that are in the public interest of free knowledge, not stances organized towards the narrow interest of the organization
 
  +
; Taking positions on public matters
* Members can self-identify as members of Wiki DC in public, without apology, but do not generally represent the organization
 
  +
* Background: in 2013, Wiki DC was publicly committed to resisting/changing SOPA/PIPA, and supporting WMF's blackout of the Wikipedias. This was framed as advocating for Internet freedom. Wiki DC had some [[Internal:Budget (2012-2013) | budget capacity]] for this.
  +
* Software patenting comes up in impending judicial cases (no legislative consideration at the moment)
 
* Work group should not claim to represent Wiki-DC without board approval of specifics (?)
 
* Generally Wiki-DC and this group should takes stances (if any) that are in the public interest of free knowledge, not stances organized towards the narrow interest of the organization
 
* Members can self-identify as members of Wiki DC in public, without apology, but do not generally represent the organization except with board approval
 
:* useful for those of us who do not have a work affiliation we can use for open-source / free-knowledge work
 
:* useful for those of us who do not have a work affiliation we can use for open-source / free-knowledge work
  +
:* an alternative framing is that coordination with the WMF is required ; but this is costly for moving quickly
* Prepare congressional briefings in 2014 after good experiences in 2013 ([[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Slowking4/congressional_briefing_agenda]])
 
  +
* in 2013, Wiki DC was committed to advocating for Internet freedom (along the SOPA/PIPA issue line. Wiki DC has some [[Internal:Budget (2012-2013) | budget capacity]] for this. contact person at Lofgren's office is senior legislative counsel: harley.geiger at mail.house.gov ; 225-3072.
 
* Software patents are hot since Supreme Court will hear a case in March or April
+
* Software patents are a subject in the public sphere. The Supreme Court will hear a case in March or April
* could blog in advance on the topic, write learned papers, or coauthor briefs
+
* Could blog in advance on the topic, write learned papers, or coauthor briefs
  +
* We can organize a chapter trip to see the case argued in March or April. An experienced person told me that if we organize a group of ten we can get seats for the entire case. They give tickets. It takes a little planning but he can help. We'll need to gather interested people and perhaps combine this with a salon or edit-a-thon or anyway a trip to a cafe.
* organize a chapter trip to see the case argued in March or April
 
 
* Possible teammates or coauthors: WMF ; Creative Commons ; Electronic Frontier Foundation ; Public Knowledge ; Open Knowledge Foundation ; OSI ; many others
 
* Possible teammates or coauthors: WMF ; Creative Commons ; Electronic Frontier Foundation ; Public Knowledge ; Open Knowledge Foundation ; OSI ; many others
 
* Work group might [https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions propose a talk for Wikimania 2014] on public policy issues, e.g. "Software patents and government software", or "Can chapters take public policy positions?"
 
* Work group might [https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions propose a talk for Wikimania 2014] on public policy issues, e.g. "Software patents and government software", or "Can chapters take public policy positions?"
   
 
; Background -- legislation of interest:
 
; Background -- legislation of interest:
:* ACTA: [[wikipedia:ACTA | The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)]], is a multinational treaty for the purpose of establishing international standards for intellectual property; agreed on in 2011 if I understand correctly
+
* ACTA: [[wikipedia:ACTA | The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)]], is a multinational treaty for the purpose of establishing international standards for intellectual property; agreed on in 2011 if I understand correctly
:* CISPA: [[wikipedia:CISPA | Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act]] -- a proposed U.S. law to "allow" (require?) sharing of Internet traffic data between the U.S. government and some companies, intended to help the government investigate cyber threats and ensure security of networks.
+
* CISPA: [[wikipedia:CISPA | Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act]] -- a proposed U.S. law to "allow" (require?) sharing of Internet traffic data between the U.S. government and some companies, intended to help the government investigate cyber threats and ensure security of networks.
:* Aaron's Law: sponsored by Rep. Zoe Lofgren's office
+
* Aaron's Law: sponsored by Rep. Zoe Lofgren's office
:* SOPA/PIPA -- effort by recording industry and Hollyword to incorporate copyright protection into the infrastructure of the Internet; beaten back in 2011.
+
* SOPA/PIPA -- effort by recording industry and Hollyword to incorporate copyright protection into the infrastructure of the Internet; beaten back in 2011.
:* CALEA: The [[wikipedia:Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act]] is a United States wiretapping law passed in 1994
+
* CALEA: The [[wikipedia:Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act]] is a United States wiretapping law passed in 1994
:* Research "Aaron's law" proposal (named for Aaron Swartz) from Rep. Lofgren's office: proposed revision to Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to reduce penalties and maybe more. [http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/technolog/aarons-law-honor-internet-activist-redefine-computer-fraud-1B8005442]
+
* Research "Aaron's law" proposal (named for Aaron Swartz) from Rep. Lofgren's office: proposed revision to Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to reduce penalties and maybe more. [http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/technolog/aarons-law-honor-internet-activist-redefine-computer-fraud-1B8005442]. A contact person at Lofgren's office is senior legislative counsel: harley.geiger at mail.house.gov ; 225-3072.

Revision as of 12:37, 10 January 2014

I'm Peter Benjamin Meyer. My regular user page is on the English Wikipedia.

I'm a new director and officer of this chapter. I'm focusing on chapter business of two kinds (a) being treasurer and (b) participating in and hosting edit-a-thons.

Chapter business

  • I was a candidate for the Wiki-DC board of directors in the Feb/March 2013 election. Here were my candidacy statements.
  • I welcome feedback about the chapter at this special-purpose address: peter.meyer (at) wikimediadc.org.

To do

Public policy work group proposal

  • Work group within Wiki DC
  • Can create and improve articles on legislation and court cases (meeting usual criteria of neutral language, sourcing of statements, and working cooperatively online) -- we've done well so far, creating the article on the upcoming case Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
  • Can team up with Cato Institute for edit-a-thons
Taking positions on public matters
  • Background: in 2013, Wiki DC was publicly committed to resisting/changing SOPA/PIPA, and supporting WMF's blackout of the Wikipedias. This was framed as advocating for Internet freedom. Wiki DC had some budget capacity for this.
  • Software patenting comes up in impending judicial cases (no legislative consideration at the moment)
  • Work group should not claim to represent Wiki-DC without board approval of specifics (?)
  • Generally Wiki-DC and this group should takes stances (if any) that are in the public interest of free knowledge, not stances organized towards the narrow interest of the organization
  • Members can self-identify as members of Wiki DC in public, without apology, but do not generally represent the organization except with board approval
  • useful for those of us who do not have a work affiliation we can use for open-source / free-knowledge work
  • an alternative framing is that coordination with the WMF is required ; but this is costly for moving quickly
  • Software patents are a subject in the public sphere. The Supreme Court will hear a case in March or April
  • Could blog in advance on the topic, write learned papers, or coauthor briefs
  • We can organize a chapter trip to see the case argued in March or April. An experienced person told me that if we organize a group of ten we can get seats for the entire case. They give tickets. It takes a little planning but he can help. We'll need to gather interested people and perhaps combine this with a salon or edit-a-thon or anyway a trip to a cafe.
  • Possible teammates or coauthors: WMF ; Creative Commons ; Electronic Frontier Foundation ; Public Knowledge ; Open Knowledge Foundation ; OSI ; many others
  • Work group might propose a talk for Wikimania 2014 on public policy issues, e.g. "Software patents and government software", or "Can chapters take public policy positions?"
Background -- legislation of interest
  • ACTA: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), is a multinational treaty for the purpose of establishing international standards for intellectual property; agreed on in 2011 if I understand correctly
  • CISPA: Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act -- a proposed U.S. law to "allow" (require?) sharing of Internet traffic data between the U.S. government and some companies, intended to help the government investigate cyber threats and ensure security of networks.
  • Aaron's Law: sponsored by Rep. Zoe Lofgren's office
  • SOPA/PIPA -- effort by recording industry and Hollyword to incorporate copyright protection into the infrastructure of the Internet; beaten back in 2011.
  • CALEA: The wikipedia:Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act is a United States wiretapping law passed in 1994
  • Research "Aaron's law" proposal (named for Aaron Swartz) from Rep. Lofgren's office: proposed revision to Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to reduce penalties and maybe more. [1]. A contact person at Lofgren's office is senior legislative counsel: harley.geiger at mail.house.gov ; 225-3072.